Repeated launch formulas make side projects look spammy
Many side-project promotions now follow the same : an existing option was unsatisfying, so a new product was built. That structure can help explain the problem a product solves, but it feels worn out when every title uses it. A product intro that should sound l and specific can start to feel like spam when it relies on the same formula.
wording adds to the sameness because it often makes different products sound alike. A builder who spent real effort making something al should also spend effort writing a more al title and first pitch.
Key points
- Side-project titles are repeating the same problem-then-product formula.
- Explaining the problem is useful, but the same structure can feel overused.
- Formulaic titles can make a product promotion look like spam.
- wording can make different es sound too similar.
- An al product needs a more specific and al first pitch.