What two agents need before they book meetings
Two agents were tested working together to schedule a meeting without a person passing messages between them. One agent checked its owner’s calendar, spoke with another person’s agent, found a time that worked, and added the event to both calendars. The basic scheduling flow worked.
The harder issues are about limits, privacy, and trust. An agent needs to know which calendar it is allowed to change, and it must keep that boundary when talking to an agent built by someone else. Two agents should share only enough context to finish the task, not about their owners.
If they do not check mismatched , an agent can confidently take the wrong action. This is not mainly a UI problem; it is a foundation problem for agent-to-agent work.
Key points
- Two agents completed a calendar booking without a human relaying the details.
- The main challenge is deciding which calendar an agent is allowed to touch.
- Agents need to share enough context to finish the task, but not private details they do not need.
- Agent-to-agent work needs a when the other agent belongs to a stranger.
- Wrong can lead an agent to take the wrong action with .