Graphiti database benchmark compares FalkorDB, Neo4j, and NornicDB
Three were compared for use with Graphiti. Graphiti helps AI apps and agents store connected information and search it later. Total ingest time was 286.4 seconds for FalkorDB, 228.9 seconds for Neo4j, and 215.3 seconds for NornicDB.
The amount of extracted information was similar across the three systems. FalkorDB extracted 120 entities and 139 facts, Neo4j extracted 116 entities and 147 facts, and NornicDB extracted 109 entities and 138 facts. Fact search speed varied by question, but most results were between 0.18 and 0.43 seconds.
NornicDB was fastest or close to fastest in several searches. NornicDB is and has more than 780 .
Key points
- FalkorDB, Neo4j, and NornicDB were benchmarked with Graphiti.
- Total ingest time was lowest for NornicDB at 215.3 seconds.
- The three systems extracted a similar number of entities and facts.
- Fact searches usually completed in well under one second.
- Useful for choosing an store, but real token savings still need workflow testing.