Legal teams are looking for deeper Claude workflows
The main need is a more practical way to use Claude in daily legal and work at a small gaming company. AI is already being used for drafting, reviewing, and brainstorming, but the current use feels basic. The desired use is not simpl edits, but deeper contract review such as spotting risks, preparing fallback positions, planning negotiation strategy, and making issue lists.
Repeatable or playbooks for , , , and regulatory work are also important. The goal is to find production-level uses that save hours each week, not small examples like writing emails faster.
Key points
- Claude is being explored for serious legal and workflows.
- Current use covers drafting, reviewing, and brainstorming.
- The bigger need is contract review for risks, fallback positions, negotiation strategy, and issue lists.
- Repeatable workflows or playbooks are wanted for , , , and regulatory work.
- The desired benchmark is saving hours every week, not just speeding up small writing tasks.