Non-US developers question yearly Cursor subscriptions
outside the United States are questioning whether a yearly Cursor still makes sense. The main worry is that recent model restrictions could eventually block access to the newest AI models. The current setup is a Pro+ plan using most of the time, with occasional GPT 5.5 use.
Possible alternatives include or Chinese s. Cursor’s upcoming own model is also being watched as a possible replacement for GPT-based coding help.
Key points
- Non-US are unsure about to a yearly Cursor plan.
- The concern is future access to the newest AI models under regional restrictions.
- The current workflow uses often and GPT 5.5 occasionally on Pro+.
- and Chinese s are being considered as alternatives.
- Cursor’s upcoming own model could matter if it reduces dependence on GPT access.