One user linked Hermes and OpenClaw through shared memory

A user split work between two agents — OpenClaw for research and Hermes for terminal-heavy — and wanted them to share context instead of copying it back and forth by hand. They found a called cognee that let both agents connect to the same dataset, avoiding the need to build a custom bridge.

The actual workflow went: OpenClaw researches, Hermes implements, the outcome gets recorded, reviewer feedback is added, and future recall improves as a result. For example, OpenClaw researched CalDAV versus and recorded a preference for avoiding ; Hermes, starting in a separate session, recalled that context and used it to make an decision, and OpenClaw was later able to recall Hermes's decision too.

The setup was also tested for whether memory could actually improve rather than just pile up transcripts. Before feedback, the guidance was to implement the API first as the fastest path — but that approach caused problems because Google's event types, , s, and sync behavior leaked into the domain and created downstream issues.

Key points

  • Split roles between OpenClaw (research) and Hermes (terminal ), linked via a called cognee
  • Decisions or research from one agent can be recalled by the other agent even in a separate session
  • Reviewer feedback was shown to improve future recall quality, not just accumulate transcripts
  • Jumping straight to implementing the API caused downstream issues from and sync behavior leaking into the domain
Read original