Developer reports quality problems with Kimi Code paid plan
A was happy with Fireworks K2.6 turbo and could work without Claude or Codex. After Fireworks discontinued its firepass plan, the developer moved to Moonshot AI’s Allegretto plan. K2.7-code felt worse lately, even compared with .
Work could fail with a , and the conversation could disappear in the middle, making it impossible to continue or hand the task to another tool. A prepared plan included a step, but Kimi Code did not check whether the server was running. It also tried to import something that had not been exported, which can break code.
Deepseek handled the same plan better, with some expected mistakes, and even opened the browser and ran tests. The developer has existing skills and MD files tuned for K2.6 turbo, so switching tools may require rewriting or adjusting that setup to regain the desired accuracy.
Key points
- Fireworks K2.6 turbo had been good enough to replace Claude or Codex for this developer’s workflow.
- The move to Moonshot AI’s Allegretto plan led to weaker results with K2.7-code.
- A could erase the active conversation and block continuation.
- Kimi Code skipped a server check and created an invalid import in the described task.
- handled the same plan better and even ran tests.