Some Gemini users miss how 2.5 Pro felt in real work
felt especially strong for and everyday tasks. It seemed better at doing the difficult parts of the work instead of only giving surface-level help.
Current Gemini options do not feel as useful to this firsthand user, even if say otherwise. The main point is that real daily usefulness can matter more than public scores.
Key points
- felt strongest for and normal daily tasks.
- Current felt less helpful in direct use.
- did not match the user's practical experience.
- Tool choice should consider real workflow fit, not only public scores.