A practical way to review Cursor cloud agent work
Cursor’s helped save time and money during a few weeks of real development work. Bugbot was useful for finding bugs in the code that got built. But it did not check whether the finished work matched the original plan.
Missing requested features and extra work outside the intended scope still needed separate review. The workflow shifted from reviewing only the code changes to reviewing the plan first. Then a second agent compared the finished build against that plan and flagged anything that had drifted.
Internal tooling was built around this review process.
Key points
- saved time and money in a real development workflow.
- Bugbot helped catch bugs but did not verify that the build matched the plan.
- Missing features and extra scope still needed a separate check.
- The review process focused on the plan before looking at code changes.
- A second agent checked the final build against the plan and flagged drift.